Gilford, New Hampshire vs. Kirkland, Washington

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Kirkland, Washington is 66.2% more expensive than Gilford, New Hampshire.

You would need a salary of $83,117 in Kirkland, Washington to maintain the standard of living you have in Gilford, New Hampshire.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Kirkland, Washington is more expensive than Gilford, New Hampshire
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
132% more expensive in Kirkland
than in Gilford, New Hampshire
Gilford, NH vs. Kirkland, WA
Compared to Gilford, Kirkland is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  66.2% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  0.5% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  167.8% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  42.3% lower
  Commute
  75.4% higher
  Health
  4.4% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  16.9% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Sandpoint, IdahoNashville, TennesseeCompare
North Bend, WashingtonSan Diego, CaliforniaCompare
Hoboken, New JerseyReston, VirginiaCompare
Eaton, ColoradoSan Antonio, TexasCompare
Peoria, ArizonaLas Vegas, NevadaCompare
Newport News, VirginiaCabot, ArkansasCompare
Montpelier, VermontBurlington, VermontCompare
Olde West Chester, OhioZionsville, IndianaCompare
Ironton, OhioHouston, TexasCompare
Charlotte, MichiganParadise, MichiganCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.