Pico Rivera, California vs. St. Paul, Minnesota

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in St. Paul, Minnesota is 31.3% cheaper than Pico Rivera, California.

You would need a salary of $46,416 in St. Paul, Minnesota to maintain the standard of living you have in Pico Rivera, California.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, St. Paul, Minnesota is cheaper than Pico Rivera, California
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
58% cheaper in St. Paul
than in Pico Rivera, California
Pico Rivera, CA vs. St. Paul, MN
Compared to Pico Rivera, St. Paul is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  31.3% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  1.2% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  55.7% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  2.7% lower
  Commute
  31.2% lower
  Health
  12.2% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  3.3% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Hartford, ConnecticutWashington, District of ColumbiaCompare
Milaca, MinnesotaKnoxville, TennesseeCompare
Flemington, New JerseyLititz, PennsylvaniaCompare
Des Moines, IowaClearwater, FloridaCompare
Indianapolis, IndianaDetroit, MichiganCompare
Groton, ConnecticutBrookings, South DakotaCompare
Ann Arbor, MichiganAtlanta, GeorgiaCompare
Toledo, OhioBenson, North CarolinaCompare
Raeford, North CarolinaLake City, FloridaCompare
Kansas City, KansasWoodinville, WashingtonCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.