Rochester, Minnesota vs. Aberdeen, South Dakota

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Aberdeen, South Dakota is 15.4% cheaper than Rochester, Minnesota.

You would need a salary of $16,930 in Aberdeen, South Dakota to maintain the standard of living you have in Rochester, Minnesota.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Aberdeen, South Dakota is cheaper than Rochester, Minnesota
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
25% cheaper in Aberdeen
than in Rochester, Minnesota
Rochester, MN vs. Aberdeen, SD
Compared to Rochester, Aberdeen is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  15.4% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  0.2% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  37.4% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  4.5% lower
  Commute
  25.3% lower
  Health
  17.8% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  0.5% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Richmond, VirginiaCharleston, West VirginiaCompare
Charlotte, North CarolinaManhattan, New YorkCompare
Waterford, ConnecticutWaltham, MassachusettsCompare
Pocatello, IdahoCurrent, MissouriCompare
Chester, West VirginiaMcLean, VirginiaCompare
Huntsville, AlabamaCasa Grande, ArizonaCompare
Little Falls, New YorkMuskegon, MichiganCompare
Albuquerque, New MexicoMurfreesboro, TennesseeCompare
Bowie, MarylandSyracuse, New YorkCompare
Los Angeles, CaliforniaLake Havasu City, ArizonaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.