St. Louis, Missouri vs. Napa, California

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Napa, California is 93.7% more expensive than St. Louis, Missouri.

You would need a salary of $154,970 in Napa, California to maintain the standard of living you have in St. Louis, Missouri.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Napa, California is more expensive than St. Louis, Missouri
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
456% more expensive in Napa
than in St. Louis, Missouri
St. Louis, MO vs. Napa, CA
Compared to St. Louis, Napa is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  93.7% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  15.7% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  485.6% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  4.2% higher
  Commute
  2.8% higher
  Health
  17.0% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  14.0% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Socorro, New MexicoWarrington, FloridaCompare
Woodhaven, MichiganPut-in-Bay, OhioCompare
Murray, UtahCortez, ColoradoCompare
Olympia, WashingtonDes Moines, IowaCompare
Denver, ColoradoPomona, CaliforniaCompare
Woodhaven, MichiganCement City, MichiganCompare
Scranton, PennsylvaniaMcKinney, TexasCompare
Woodhaven, MichiganPut-in-Bay, OhioCompare
Midland, TexasLincoln Park, MichiganCompare
Raleigh, North CarolinaJoshua Tree, CaliforniaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.