Bakersfield, California vs. Tulsa, Oklahoma

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Tulsa, Oklahoma is 20.3% cheaper than Bakersfield, California.

You would need a salary of $167,337 in Tulsa, Oklahoma to maintain the standard of living you have in Bakersfield, California.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Tulsa, Oklahoma is cheaper than Bakersfield, California
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
48% cheaper in Tulsa
than in Bakersfield, California
Bakersfield, CA vs. Tulsa, OK
Compared to Bakersfield, Tulsa is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  20.3% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  4.1% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  51.1% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  14.4% lower
  Commute
  13.4% lower
  Health
  12.9% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  2.3% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Mustang, OklahomaCamden, New JerseyCompare
Rancho Cucamonga, CaliforniaFranklin, TennesseeCompare
Anderson, South CarolinaDover, DelawareCompare
Salem, OregonDover, DelawareCompare
Zephyr Cove, NevadaSanta Fe, New MexicoCompare
Mason, OhioAlabama, AlabamaCompare
Casa Grande, ArizonaBoulder City, NevadaCompare
Zephyr Cove, NevadaSanta Fe, New MexicoCompare
Knoxville, TennesseeMacon, GeorgiaCompare
Rockingham, North CarolinaAberdeen, North CarolinaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.