Lancaster, California vs. Marble Falls, Texas

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Marble Falls, Texas is 16.8% cheaper than Lancaster, California.

You would need a salary of $74,896 in Marble Falls, Texas to maintain the standard of living you have in Lancaster, California.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Marble Falls, Texas is cheaper than Lancaster, California
• Childcare is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Childcare
47% cheaper in Marble Falls
than in Lancaster, California
Lancaster, CA vs. Marble Falls, TX
Compared to Lancaster, Marble Falls is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  16.8% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  6.3% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  12.0% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  14.7% lower
  Commute
  33.1% lower
  Health
  16.0% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  4.6% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
East Lansing, MichiganBoston, MassachusettsCompare
Lawton, OklahomaNew York, New YorkCompare
San Francisco, CaliforniaBozeman, MontanaCompare
Port Charlotte, FloridaCarson City, NevadaCompare
Austin, TexasLakewood, CaliforniaCompare
Salem, OregonMount Vernon, WashingtonCompare
Louisville, KentuckyBoston, MassachusettsCompare
Ann Arbor, MichiganNew Haven, ConnecticutCompare
Manhattan, KansasKansas City, MissouriCompare
Denver, ColoradoSouth San Francisco, CaliforniaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.