Fontana, California vs. Batesville, Arkansas

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Batesville, Arkansas is 43.2% cheaper than Fontana, California.

You would need a salary of $42,627 in Batesville, Arkansas to maintain the standard of living you have in Fontana, California.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Batesville, Arkansas is cheaper than Fontana, California
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
75% cheaper in Batesville
than in Fontana, California
Fontana, CA vs. Batesville, AR
Compared to Fontana, Batesville is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  43.2% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  7.6% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  75.9% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  7.8% lower
  Commute
  40.7% lower
  Health
  5.8% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  4.7% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
McKinney, TexasTwin Falls, IdahoCompare
Camden, ArkansasTucson, ArizonaCompare
Fresno, CaliforniaCanyon, TexasCompare
Brookline, MassachusettsLeonia, New JerseyCompare
Owatonna, MinnesotaBlooming Prairie, MinnesotaCompare
Santa Rosa, CaliforniaSeattle, WashingtonCompare
Alameda, CaliforniaGrass Valley, CaliforniaCompare
Linthicum, MarylandFolsom, CaliforniaCompare
Benjamin, UtahRexburg, IdahoCompare
Columbia, MissouriBoulder, ColoradoCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.