Frisco, Texas vs. Rancho Cucamonga, California

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Rancho Cucamonga, California is 14.4% more expensive than Frisco, Texas.

You would need a salary of $57,178 in Rancho Cucamonga, California to maintain the standard of living you have in Frisco, Texas.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Rancho Cucamonga, California is more expensive than Frisco, Texas
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
11% more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga
than in Frisco, Texas
Frisco, TX vs. Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Compared to Frisco, Rancho Cucamonga is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  14.4% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Food
  2.4% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  28.2% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Median Home Cost
  Utilities
  5.3% higher
  Commute
  25.1% higher
  Health
  14.2% lower
  Taxes
  Childcare
  Personal
  9.8% higher