Gilford, New Hampshire vs. Palm Springs, California

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Palm Springs, California is 24.1% more expensive than Gilford, New Hampshire.

You would need a salary of $248,237 in Palm Springs, California to maintain the standard of living you have in Gilford, New Hampshire.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Palm Springs, California is more expensive than Gilford, New Hampshire
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
36% more expensive in Palm Springs
than in Gilford, New Hampshire
Gilford, NH vs. Palm Springs, CA
Compared to Gilford, Palm Springs is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  24.1% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  8.5% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  54.2% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  5.9% lower
  Commute
  68.3% higher
  Health
  3.3% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  1.8% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Austin, TexasSanta Clarita, CaliforniaCompare
Bayfield, ColoradoAustin, TexasCompare
Inman, South CarolinaSeattle, WashingtonCompare
El Paso, TexasLas Vegas, NevadaCompare
Canton, GeorgiaJohns Creek, GeorgiaCompare
Lincoln, NebraskaMurphys, CaliforniaCompare
Aiken, South CarolinaGreen Valley, ArizonaCompare
Conway, South CarolinaAurora, IllinoisCompare
Las Vegas, NevadaTroy, OhioCompare
Little Rock, ArkansasAuburn, AlabamaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.