Gilford, New Hampshire vs. Redwood City, California

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Redwood City, California is 157.4% more expensive than Gilford, New Hampshire.

You would need a salary of $128,711 in Redwood City, California to maintain the standard of living you have in Gilford, New Hampshire.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Redwood City, California is more expensive than Gilford, New Hampshire
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
255% more expensive in Redwood City
than in Gilford, New Hampshire
Gilford, NH vs. Redwood_City, CA
Compared to Gilford, Redwood_City is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  157.4% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  7.7% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  497.1% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  18.8% lower
  Commute
  79.7% higher
  Health
  38.9% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  15.8% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Gridley, CaliforniaSeattle, WashingtonCompare
Muskogee, OklahomaHugo, OklahomaCompare
Fort Collins, ColoradoDurango, ColoradoCompare
Warren, New JerseyAtlanta, GeorgiaCompare
Dayton, OhioAnn Arbor, MichiganCompare
Fairfield, CaliforniaLos Angeles, CaliforniaCompare
Suwanee, GeorgiaEugene, OregonCompare
Salem, OregonMadison, AlabamaCompare
Navarre, FloridaLong Beach, CaliforniaCompare
Greenleaf, IdahoChicago, IllinoisCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.