Laurel, Montana vs. Litchfield, Minnesota

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Litchfield, Minnesota is 20.2% cheaper than Laurel, Montana.

You would need a salary of $39,916 in Litchfield, Minnesota to maintain the standard of living you have in Laurel, Montana.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Litchfield, Minnesota is cheaper than Laurel, Montana
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
45% cheaper in Litchfield
than in Laurel, Montana
Laurel, MT vs. Litchfield, MN
Compared to Laurel, Litchfield is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  20.2% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  5.7% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  39.7% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  5.1% lower
  Commute
  19.4% lower
  Health
  12.6% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  1.2% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Ithaca, New YorkBillings, MontanaCompare
Minneapolis, MinnesotaBoulevard, CaliforniaCompare
Norfolk, VirginiaFlorence, South CarolinaCompare
Temecula, CaliforniaPhoenix, ArizonaCompare
Hot Springs, South DakotaFredericksburg, TexasCompare
Tulsa, OklahomaMadison, WisconsinCompare
West Sacramento, CaliforniaLouisville, KentuckyCompare
West Richland, WashingtonKingman, ArizonaCompare
Carlsbad, CaliforniaPaso Robles, CaliforniaCompare
Tacoma, WashingtonCulpeper, VirginiaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.