Oakdale, Minnesota vs. Kirkland, Washington

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Kirkland, Washington is 73.3% more expensive than Oakdale, Minnesota.

You would need a salary of $86,654 in Kirkland, Washington to maintain the standard of living you have in Oakdale, Minnesota.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Kirkland, Washington is more expensive than Oakdale, Minnesota
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
222% more expensive in Kirkland
than in Oakdale, Minnesota
Oakdale, MN vs. Kirkland, WA
Compared to Oakdale, Kirkland is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  73.3% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  7.9% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  182.4% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  28.6% lower
  Commute
  27.4% higher
  Health
  18.9% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  10.8% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Fresno, CaliforniaGreenville, South CarolinaCompare
Vici, OklahomaAlamogordo, New MexicoCompare
Kansas City, MissouriBlackfoot, IdahoCompare
Corpus Christi, TexasBoerne, TexasCompare
Shawnee, OklahomaOklahoma City, OklahomaCompare
Fort Walton Beach, FloridaMesa, ArizonaCompare
Andover, MinnesotaMarysville, WashingtonCompare
Phoenix, ArizonaChesterfield, MissouriCompare
Erie, PennsylvaniaPawtucket, Rhode IslandCompare
Pinetop-Lakeside, ArizonaPoplar Bluff, MissouriCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.