Palm Springs, California vs. St. Paul, Minnesota

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in St. Paul, Minnesota is 26.3% cheaper than Palm Springs, California.

You would need a salary of $55,269 in St. Paul, Minnesota to maintain the standard of living you have in Palm Springs, California.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, St. Paul, Minnesota is cheaper than Palm Springs, California
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
56% cheaper in St. Paul
than in Palm Springs, California
Palm_Springs, CA vs. St._Paul, MN
Compared to Palm_Springs, St._Paul is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  26.3% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  0.1% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  47.3% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  14.4% lower
  Commute
  15.8% lower
  Health
  12.8% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  3.2% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Charlotte, North CarolinaFort Worth, TexasCompare
Sparks, NevadaDallas, TexasCompare
Bay City, MichiganMarquette, MichiganCompare
Peoria, IllinoisCeres, CaliforniaCompare
Evans, GeorgiaQueen Creek, ArizonaCompare
Burbank, IllinoisMonroe, WisconsinCompare
DuPont, WashingtonChattanooga, TennesseeCompare
Warsaw, IndianaIndianapolis, IndianaCompare
Peoria, ArizonaLaguna Woods, CaliforniaCompare
Nashville, TennesseeBowling Green, OhioCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.