Pittsfield, Massachusetts vs. Napa, California

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Napa, California is 81.0% more expensive than Pittsfield, Massachusetts.

You would need a salary of $181,017 in Napa, California to maintain the standard of living you have in Pittsfield, Massachusetts.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Napa, California is more expensive than Pittsfield, Massachusetts
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
227% more expensive in Napa
than in Pittsfield, Massachusetts
Pittsfield, MA vs. Napa, CA
Compared to Pittsfield, Napa is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  81.0% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  9.3% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  294.6% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  10.3% lower
  Commute
  38.2% higher
  Health
  9.1% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  3.1% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Aberdeen, WashingtonAustin, TexasCompare
Ithaca, New YorkRichmond, VirginiaCompare
Colorado Springs, ColoradoPhoenix, ArizonaCompare
Orange City, IowaSolon, IowaCompare
Steilacoom, WashingtonShreveport, LouisianaCompare
Bristol, VirginiaNewburyport, MassachusettsCompare
The Villages, FloridaReno, NevadaCompare
Pocatello, IdahoMahomet, IllinoisCompare
Cumming, GeorgiaOmaha, NebraskaCompare
Woodland Park, ColoradoOgden, UtahCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.