Rochester, Minnesota vs. Tulsa, Oklahoma

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Tulsa, Oklahoma is 10.9% cheaper than Rochester, Minnesota.

You would need a salary of $38,305 in Tulsa, Oklahoma to maintain the standard of living you have in Rochester, Minnesota.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Tulsa, Oklahoma is cheaper than Rochester, Minnesota
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
38% cheaper in Tulsa
than in Rochester, Minnesota
Rochester, MN vs. Tulsa, OK
Compared to Rochester, Tulsa is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  10.9% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  5.0% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  48.4% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  4.1% lower
  Commute
  20.7% higher
  Health
  16.6% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  0.0% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Okeechobee, FloridaLake Wales, FloridaCompare
Fannett, TexasLumberton, TexasCompare
Olympia, WashingtonLas Cruces, New MexicoCompare
Pecatonica, IllinoisElk Grove, CaliforniaCompare
Hendersonville, North CarolinaEstero, FloridaCompare
Anderson, IndianaFrisco, TexasCompare
Lancaster, OhioDallas, TexasCompare
Kalamazoo, MichiganAsheville, North CarolinaCompare
Omaha, NebraskaProvo, UtahCompare
Hartford, ConnecticutSanta Clara, CaliforniaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.