Saco, Maine vs. South St. Paul, Minnesota

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in South St. Paul, Minnesota is 11.3% cheaper than Saco, Maine.

You would need a salary of $44,355 in South St. Paul, Minnesota to maintain the standard of living you have in Saco, Maine.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, South St. Paul, Minnesota is cheaper than Saco, Maine
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
37% cheaper in South St. Paul
than in Saco, Maine
Saco, ME vs. South St. Paul, MN
Compared to Saco, South St. Paul is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  11.3% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  9.4% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  23.7% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  4.8% lower
  Commute
  20.9% higher
  Health
  17.9% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  4.1% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Salt Lake City, UtahVancouver, WashingtonCompare
Effingham, IllinoisLeesburg, FloridaCompare
Bethlehem, PennsylvaniaBowling Green, OhioCompare
Dripping Springs, TexasCanyon Lake, TexasCompare
Effingham, IllinoisCape Girardeau, MissouriCompare
San Antonio, TexasPark City, UtahCompare
Commack, New YorkNashua, New HampshireCompare
Knoxville, TennesseeMiller Place, New YorkCompare
Richardson, TexasPagosa Springs, ColoradoCompare
Baton Rouge, LouisianaNew Orleans, LouisianaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.