St. Paul, Minnesota vs. Napa, California

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Napa, California is 62.5% more expensive than St. Paul, Minnesota.

You would need a salary of $243,712 in Napa, California to maintain the standard of living you have in St. Paul, Minnesota.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Napa, California is more expensive than St. Paul, Minnesota
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
221% more expensive in Napa
than in St. Paul, Minnesota
St. Paul, MN vs. Napa, CA
Compared to St. Paul, Napa is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  62.5% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  10.1% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  209.2% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  2.4% higher
  Commute
  7.6% lower
  Health
  43.9% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  0.7% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Valdosta, GeorgiaLaGrange, GeorgiaCompare
Raleigh, North CarolinaAccord, New YorkCompare
Chepachet, Rhode IslandTucson, ArizonaCompare
Brownsville, TexasTyler, TexasCompare
San Diego, CaliforniaPhoenix, ArizonaCompare
Dallas, TexasLake Los Angeles, CaliforniaCompare
Sneads Ferry, North CarolinaAtlanta, GeorgiaCompare
Jasper, IndianaSan Francisco, CaliforniaCompare
Sherman, TexasConroe, TexasCompare
Prescott, ArizonaNorth Fort Myers, FloridaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.