Chico, California vs. South St. Paul, Minnesota

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in South St. Paul, Minnesota is 18.3% cheaper than Chico, California.

You would need a salary of $65,328 in South St. Paul, Minnesota to maintain the standard of living you have in Chico, California.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, South St. Paul, Minnesota is cheaper than Chico, California
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
38% cheaper in South St. Paul
than in Chico, California
Chico, CA vs. South St. Paul, MN
Compared to Chico, South St. Paul is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  18.3% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  2.8% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  43.0% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  12.5% lower
  Commute
  18.0% higher
  Health
  38.2% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  4.6% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Las Vegas, NevadaThousand Oaks, CaliforniaCompare
Sarasota, FloridaVonore, TennesseeCompare
Norfolk, VirginiaYork Harbor, MaineCompare
Kerrville, TexasMaumelle, ArkansasCompare
Raleigh, North CarolinaSan Francisco, CaliforniaCompare
Jasper, IndianaThe Villages, FloridaCompare
Marietta, OhioGainesville, VirginiaCompare
Pullman, WashingtonGreenville, North CarolinaCompare
Sapulpa, OklahomaDanville, KentuckyCompare
Danbury, ConnecticutSlidell, LouisianaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.