Columbia Falls, Montana vs. Richland, Washington

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Richland, Washington is 9.6% cheaper than Columbia Falls, Montana.

You would need a salary of $81,317 in Richland, Washington to maintain the standard of living you have in Columbia Falls, Montana.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Richland, Washington is cheaper than Columbia Falls, Montana
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
28% cheaper in Richland
than in Columbia Falls, Montana
Columbia Falls, MT vs. Richland, WA
Compared to Columbia Falls, Richland is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  9.6% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  1.5% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  2.3% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  0.6% lower
  Commute
  8.4% higher
  Health
  14.3% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  9.5% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Estero, FloridaGrapevine, TexasCompare
Rougemont, North CarolinaApex, North CarolinaCompare
Riverside, CaliforniaEl Dorado Hills, CaliforniaCompare
Springdale, UtahKernville, CaliforniaCompare
Fargo, North DakotaScottsdale, ArizonaCompare
St. Paul, MinnesotaOlympia, WashingtonCompare
Springdale, UtahKernville, CaliforniaCompare
Sayreville, New JerseyFort Myers, FloridaCompare
Cedar City, UtahRutherford, New JerseyCompare
Wenatchee, WashingtonOregon City, OregonCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.