Culver City, California vs. St. Paul, Minnesota

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in St. Paul, Minnesota is 54.9% cheaper than Culver City, California.

You would need a salary of $22,532 in St. Paul, Minnesota to maintain the standard of living you have in Culver City, California.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, St. Paul, Minnesota is cheaper than Culver City, California
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
78% cheaper in St. Paul
than in Culver City, California
Culver City, CA vs. St. Paul, MN
Compared to Culver City, St. Paul is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  54.9% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  8.1% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  80.9% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  11.2% higher
  Commute
  28.7% lower
  Health
  15.6% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  4.7% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Brunswick, MaineWoolwich, MaineCompare
Houston, TexasNew Haven, ConnecticutCompare
Walnut Creek, CaliforniaAlameda, CaliforniaCompare
Gainesville, FloridaGreen Cove Springs, FloridaCompare
Washington, District of ColumbiaAustin, TexasCompare
Evansville, WisconsinEvansville, IndianaCompare
Denver, ColoradoAlabama, AlabamaCompare
Indianapolis, IndianaRedmond, WashingtonCompare
Buena Vista, ColoradoWard, ColoradoCompare
Lynchburg, VirginiaEvansville, IndianaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.