Eureka Springs, Arkansas vs. Bakersfield, California

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Bakersfield, California is 28.3% more expensive than Eureka Springs, Arkansas.

You would need a salary of $64,144 in Bakersfield, California to maintain the standard of living you have in Eureka Springs, Arkansas.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Bakersfield, California is more expensive than Eureka Springs, Arkansas
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
34% more expensive in Bakersfield
than in Eureka Springs, Arkansas
Eureka Springs, AR vs. Bakersfield, CA
Compared to Eureka Springs, Bakersfield is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  28.3% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Food
  1.9% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  39.4% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Median Home Cost
  Utilities
  20.5% higher
  Commute
  45.1% higher
  Health
  1.1% higher
  Taxes
  Childcare
  Personal
  9.2% higher