Gilford, New Hampshire vs. Forks, Washington

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Forks, Washington is 16.5% cheaper than Gilford, New Hampshire.

You would need a salary of $41,744 in Forks, Washington to maintain the standard of living you have in Gilford, New Hampshire.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Forks, Washington is cheaper than Gilford, New Hampshire
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
36% cheaper in Forks
than in Gilford, New Hampshire
Gilford, NH vs. Forks, WA
Compared to Gilford, Forks is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  16.5% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  10.3% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  29.9% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  45.4% lower
  Commute
  2.8% higher
  Health
  21.9% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  4.5% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Reston, VirginiaHaymarket, VirginiaCompare
Alma, ColoradoLeadville, ColoradoCompare
Leesburg, VirginiaLoudon, TennesseeCompare
Plano, TexasCamas, WashingtonCompare
Raleigh, North CarolinaSt. Augustine Shores, FloridaCompare
Palm Beach Gardens, FloridaLouisville, KentuckyCompare
Lincoln, NebraskaEast Lansing, MichiganCompare
Lubbock, TexasSandy, UtahCompare
Blackwood, New JerseyConway, South CarolinaCompare
Daytona Beach, FloridaHouston, TexasCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.