Omaha, Nebraska vs. Kirkland, Washington

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Kirkland, Washington is 99.6% more expensive than Omaha, Nebraska.

You would need a salary of $99,777 in Kirkland, Washington to maintain the standard of living you have in Omaha, Nebraska.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Kirkland, Washington is more expensive than Omaha, Nebraska
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
318% more expensive in Kirkland
than in Omaha, Nebraska
Omaha, NE vs. Kirkland, WA
Compared to Omaha, Kirkland is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  99.6% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  12.6% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  307.8% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  29.2% lower
  Commute
  66.0% higher
  Health
  22.9% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  33.9% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Galena, IllinoisPensacola, FloridaCompare
Bellevue, WashingtonBellingham, WashingtonCompare
East Rochester, New YorkLe Roy, New YorkCompare
Grafton, MassachusettsNewtown, ConnecticutCompare
Royal Oak, MichiganColumbine, ColoradoCompare
Columbus, GeorgiaMenlo Park, CaliforniaCompare
Katy, TexasLeadville, ColoradoCompare
Bowman, GeorgiaHelen, GeorgiaCompare
Allentown, PennsylvaniaMobile, AlabamaCompare
Elizabeth City, North CarolinaTaylorsville, North CarolinaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.