Cost of Living Calculator - Pasadena, California vs Chelmsford, Massachusetts


The cost of living in Chelmsford, Massachusetts is 28.3% cheaper than Pasadena, California.

You would need a salary of $125,552 in Chelmsford, Massachusetts to maintain the standard of living you have in Pasadena, California.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Chelmsford, Massachusetts is cheaper than Pasadena, California
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
45% cheaper in Chelmsford
than in Pasadena, California
Pasadena, CA vs Chelmsford, MA
Compared to Pasadena, Chelmsford is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  28.3% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Food
  3.6% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  47.7% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Median Home Cost
  Utilities
  14.8% higher
  Commute
  34.0% lower
  Health
  1.6% higher
  Taxes
  Childcare
  Personal
  19.8% higher

The premier source for comprehensive city data for over 30 years.

© Best Places. All rights reserved.