Port Orchard, Washington vs. Crookston, Minnesota

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Crookston, Minnesota is 34.4% cheaper than Port Orchard, Washington.

You would need a salary of $32,787 in Crookston, Minnesota to maintain the standard of living you have in Port Orchard, Washington.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Crookston, Minnesota is cheaper than Port Orchard, Washington
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
65% cheaper in Crookston
than in Port Orchard, Washington
Port Orchard, WA vs. Crookston, MN
Compared to Port Orchard, Crookston is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  34.4% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  5.1% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  62.0% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  28.2% higher
  Commute
  32.4% lower
  Health
  8.8% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  2.0% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Waco, TexasFitzwilliam, New HampshireCompare
Chicago, IllinoisKansas City, MissouriCompare
Conway, ArkansasFayetteville, ArkansasCompare
Greenville, North CarolinaKannapolis, North CarolinaCompare
Mead, ColoradoSparks, NevadaCompare
Lander, WyomingLamesa, TexasCompare
Round Lake, IllinoisLake in the Hills, IllinoisCompare
Cullman, AlabamaMaryville, TennesseeCompare
Kingsland, TexasRiverside, CaliforniaCompare
Conroe, TexasChelsea, MichiganCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.