Rancho Cucamonga, California vs. Frisco, Texas

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Frisco, Texas is 12.6% cheaper than Rancho Cucamonga, California.

You would need a salary of $43,723 in Frisco, Texas to maintain the standard of living you have in Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Frisco, Texas is cheaper than Rancho Cucamonga, California
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
10% cheaper in Frisco
than in Rancho Cucamonga, California
Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs. Frisco, TX
Compared to Rancho Cucamonga, Frisco is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  12.6% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  2.5% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  22.0% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  5.0% lower
  Commute
  20.1% lower
  Health
  16.5% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  8.9% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Montague, MichiganMonticello, IllinoisCompare
Tuscaloosa, AlabamaCollierville, TennesseeCompare
Myrtle Beach, South CarolinaMiami, FloridaCompare
Jacksonville, FloridaHartford, ConnecticutCompare
Fort Wayne, IndianaTampa, FloridaCompare
Lewisville, TexasBakersfield, CaliforniaCompare
Houston, TexasFontana, CaliforniaCompare
Ithaca, New YorkTowson, MarylandCompare
Houston, TexasFontana, CaliforniaCompare
Fresno, CaliforniaYakima, WashingtonCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.