Rochester Hills, Michigan vs. Tulsa, Oklahoma

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Tulsa, Oklahoma is 26.9% cheaper than Rochester Hills, Michigan.

You would need a salary of $109,672 in Tulsa, Oklahoma to maintain the standard of living you have in Rochester Hills, Michigan.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Tulsa, Oklahoma is cheaper than Rochester Hills, Michigan
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
55% cheaper in Tulsa
than in Rochester Hills, Michigan
Rochester Hills, MI vs. Tulsa, OK
Compared to Rochester Hills, Tulsa is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  26.9% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  6.0% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  63.7% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  4.0% lower
  Commute
  24.8% lower
  Health
  29.4% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  7.9% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Houston, TexasSan Jose, CaliforniaCompare
Chicago, IllinoisOrlando, FloridaCompare
Bloomington, IllinoisChicago, IllinoisCompare
Daytona Beach, FloridaIowa City, IowaCompare
Twin Falls, IdahoLead, South DakotaCompare
Redmond, OregonMitchell, South DakotaCompare
San Jose, CaliforniaCincinnati, OhioCompare
Savannah, GeorgiaBlack Mountain, North CarolinaCompare
Pompano Beach, FloridaNewport News, VirginiaCompare
Gainesville, FloridaMinneapolis, MinnesotaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.