Rutland, Vermont vs. New Ulm, Minnesota

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in New Ulm, Minnesota is 12.7% cheaper than Rutland, Vermont.

You would need a salary of $18,342 in New Ulm, Minnesota to maintain the standard of living you have in Rutland, Vermont.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, New Ulm, Minnesota is cheaper than Rutland, Vermont
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
2% cheaper in New Ulm
than in Rutland, Vermont
Rutland, VT vs. New Ulm, MN
Compared to Rutland, New Ulm is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  12.7% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  7.8% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  17.3% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  13.3% lower
  Commute
  7.7% lower
  Health
  35.1% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  0.5% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Lincolnshire, IllinoisColorado Springs, ColoradoCompare
Portage, MichiganRamona, CaliforniaCompare
Providence, Rhode IslandScituate, Rhode IslandCompare
Columbus, OhioBarstow, CaliforniaCompare
Fergus Falls, MinnesotaSan Francisco, CaliforniaCompare
Cordova, AlaskaPetersburg, AlaskaCompare
Austin, TexasPell City, AlabamaCompare
Columbus, OhioBarstow, CaliforniaCompare
Spokane, WashingtonLubbock, TexasCompare
Joplin, MissouriGoodwell, OklahomaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.