San Francisco, California vs. St. Paul, Minnesota

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in St. Paul, Minnesota is 59.6% cheaper than San Francisco, California.

You would need a salary of $44,047 in St. Paul, Minnesota to maintain the standard of living you have in San Francisco, California.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, St. Paul, Minnesota is cheaper than San Francisco, California
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
78% cheaper in St. Paul
than in San Francisco, California
San Francisco, CA vs. St. Paul, MN
Compared to San Francisco, St. Paul is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  59.6% lower
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  14.1% lower
  Housing (Homeowner)
  84.1% lower
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  0.0% higher
  Commute
  30.7% lower
  Health
  33.8% lower
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  10.0% lower
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Salt Lake City, UtahLas Vegas, NevadaCompare
Streamwood, IllinoisElgin, IllinoisCompare
Essex, VermontVista, CaliforniaCompare
Winter Springs, FloridaOrem, UtahCompare
Lancaster, OhioSalt Lake City, UtahCompare
Lancaster, OhioIndianapolis, IndianaCompare
Lancaster, OhioCollege Park, MarylandCompare
Lancaster, OhioMinneapolis, MinnesotaCompare
Salt Lake City, UtahLas Vegas, NevadaCompare
Lancaster, OhioBirmingham, AlabamaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.