Siloam Springs, Arkansas vs. Sugar Land, Texas

Cost of Living Comparison

The cost of living in Sugar Land, Texas is 33.1% more expensive than Siloam Springs, Arkansas.

You would need a salary of $66,569 in Sugar Land, Texas to maintain the standard of living you have in Siloam Springs, Arkansas.
Comparison highlights
• Overall, Sugar Land, Texas is more expensive than Siloam Springs, Arkansas
• Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
Median Home Cost
72% more expensive in Sugar Land
than in Siloam Springs, Arkansas
Siloam Springs, AR vs. Sugar Land, TX
Compared to Siloam Springs, Sugar Land is:
  Homeowner
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  33.1% higher
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Renter
      No Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes not Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
      No Child Care, Taxes Considered
  Unlock with Premium
  Food
  6.0% higher
  Housing (Homeowner)
  96.8% higher
  Housing (Rent)
  Unlock with Premium
  Median Home Cost
  Unlock with Premium
  Utilities
  7.9% higher
  Commute
  48.2% higher
  Health
  5.9% higher
  Taxes
  Unlock with Premium
  Childcare
  Unlock with Premium
  Personal
  6.8% higher
Cost of Food
Popular Cost of Living Searches
Current CityComparison City
Leesburg, VirginiaVirginia Beach, VirginiaCompare
Sandy, UtahWest Jordan, UtahCompare
Rockville, MarylandWaynesboro, VirginiaCompare
Leander, TexasChesapeake, VirginiaCompare
Leander, TexasLa Vernia, TexasCompare
Sioux City, IowaArkansas City, KansasCompare
Bridgewater, New JerseyGermantown, MarylandCompare
Morgantown, West VirginiaBlacksburg, VirginiaCompare
Sandy, UtahWest Jordan, UtahCompare
Enid, OklahomaCape Canaveral, FloridaCompare

Privacy Policy  •  Terms of Use  •  Returns & Refunds
© Best Places. All rights reserved.